Optimal sampling interval for characterisation of the circadian rhythm of body temperature in homeothermic animals using periodogram and cosinor analysis.

Core body temperature (T c) is a critical aspect of homeostasis in birds and mammals and is increasingly used as a biomarker of the fitness of an animal to its environment. Periodogram and cosinor analysis can be used to estimate the characteristics of the circadian rhythm of T c from data obtained on loggers that have limited memory capacity and battery life. The sampling interval can be manipulated to maximise the recording period, but the impact of sampling interval on the output of periodogram or cosinor analysis is unknown. Some basic guidelines are available from signal analysis theory, but those guidelines have never been tested on T c data. We obtained data at 1-, 5- or 10-min intervals from nine avian or mammalian species, and re-sampled those data to simulate logging at up to 240-min intervals. The period of the rhythm was first analysed using the Lomb-Scargle periodogram, and the mesor, amplitude, acrophase and adjusted coefficient of determination (R 2) from the original and the re-sampled data were obtained using cosinor analysis. Sampling intervals longer than 60 min did not affect the average mesor, amplitude, acrophase or adjusted R 2, but did impact the estimation of the period of the rhythm. In most species, the period was not detectable when intervals longer than 120 min were used. In all individual profiles, a 30-min sampling interval modified the values of the mesor and amplitude by less than 0.1°C, and the adjusted R 2 by less than 0.1. At a 30-min interval, the acrophase was accurate to within 15 min for all species except mice. The adjusted R 2 increased as sampling frequency decreased. In most cases, a 30-min sampling interval provides a reliable estimate of the circadian T c rhythm using periodogram and cosinor analysis. Our findings will help biologists to select sampling intervals to fit their research goals.

Immunolocalization of aquaporins 1, 3, and 5 in the nasal respiratory mucosa of a panting species, the sheep (Ovis aries).

The nasal respiratory mucosa is the primary site for evaporative water loss in panting species, necessitating the movement of water across the nasal epithelium. Aquaporins (AQP) are protein channels that facilitate water movement in various fluid transporting tissues of non-panting species. Whether the requirement for enhanced capacity for transepithelial water movement in the nasal respiratory mucosa of panting species has led to differences in AQP localization is unknown. Using immunohistochemistry, we report the localization of AQP1, 3, and 5 in the nasal respiratory mucosa of sheep being exposed to ambient temperatures of ~21 °C or ~38 °C for 4.5 h before death (n=3/treatment). Exposure to either treatment resulted in panting. While exposure to ~38 °C resulted in a higher respiratory frequency (mean difference: 82 breaths min(-1); P<0.001) than exposure to ~21 °C, there was no difference in the localization of AQPs. Connective tissue and vascular endothelial cells expressed AQP1. Glandular acini expressed AQP1 and apically localized AQP5, which was also present in glandular duct cells. Ciliated columnar epithelial cells expressed AQP5 apically and AQP3 basolaterally. Basal cells expressed AQP3. The distribution and co-localization of AQPs in the ovine nasal respiratory mucosa is different to that reported in non-panting species and may reflect the physiological demands associated with enhanced respiratory evaporation. We propose that AQP1, 3, and 5 may constitute a transepithelial water pathway via glandular secretions and across the surface epithelium, which provides a possible means for rapid and controllable water movement in the nasal respiratory mucosa of a panting species.

The cranial arterio-venous temperature difference is related to respiratory evaporative heat loss in a panting species, the sheep (Ovis aries).

Panting is a mechanism that increases respiratory evaporative heat loss (REHL) under heat load. Because REHL uses body water, it is physiologically and ecologically relevant to know under what conditions free-ranging animals use panting. We investigated whether the cranial arterio-venous temperature difference could provide information about REHL. We exposed sheep to environments varying in ambient dry bulb temperatures (Env 1: ~15°C, Env 2: ~25°C, Env 3: ~40°C, Env 4: ~40°C + infrared radiation) and measured REHL simultaneously with carotid arterial (T (car)) and jugular venous (T (jug)) blood temperatures, as well as brain (T (brain)) and rectal (T (rec)) temperatures. REHL increased significantly with ambient temperature, from 18.4 ± 4.5 W at Env 1 to 79.5 ± 12.6 W at Env 4 (P < 10(-6)). While there was no effect of environment on T (car) (P = 0.7) or T (jug) (P = 0.09), the difference between them (T (a-v) = T (car) - T (jug)) increased from Env 1 to Env 2 (P = 0.04) and from Env 3 to Env 4 (P = 0.008). T (a-v) reached a maximum of 0.7 ± 0.2°C at Env 4 and was positively correlated with REHL across environments (r (2) = 0.78, F = 34.7, P < 10(-3)). Calculated cranial blood flow changed only from Env 2 to Env 3 (P = 0.002). The increase in REHL maintained homeothermy when dry heat loss decreased. While REHL could increase without generating an increase in T (a-v), any increase in T (a-v) was always associated with an increase in REHL. We conclude that the cranial T (a-v) provides useful information about REHL in panting animals.